The Okinawan art of Karate has a very interesting yet convoluted history. This history has left us with sparsely documented evidence, which, in an attempt to fill in the blanks or inspire future generations, is often interlaced with embellished stories of myth and legend.
Karate as a systematised and stylistic curriculum is still very modern compared to mainland Japanese Koryu Budo timelines. For instance, it was only officially named Empty Hand 空手 on 25th October 1936 at the now infamous ‘Meeting of the Masters’, which was held to discuss and decide upon the future of the art. This date is now celebrated annually as World Karate Day to commemorate this pivotal event.
The early history of Karate is said to have its roots in Ti, a native martial system practised by the noble families who served the royal government as part of the old Ryukyu Kingdom. Over time, this indigenous art, combined with knowledge gained from neighbouring countries due to the island’s strategic position for diplomatic, trade, and cultural exchange—most notably with China and Japan—created a valuable melting pot for Okinawan martial arts to flourish.
Indeed, the development of Okinawan martial arts represents a rich tapestry woven from various cultural influences across Asia and beyond. The blending of techniques, philosophies, and training methods from different regions has positively contributed to its dynamic and adaptable nature, making it a unique and multifaceted practice.
To help bring Karate into the 20th Century as a modern system of budo and to ensure it holds its own alongside other contemporary Japanese arts such as Judo and Kendo, it was necessary to alter how it was viewed, practiced, and taught.
In the early 1900s, the Karate pioneer Itosu Anko was influential in modifying the art and ‘defanging’ its practices to better suit public dissemination and safe delivery within the Okinawa school system as a recreational activity. This idea was further perpetuated over time, allowing it to be safely studied by individuals of all ages and abilities.
Moreover, given that the modern representation of ancient Japanese weaponry and grappling arts was already firmly established on the mainland, there remained an apparent gap for a system specialising in pugilism, which Karate could cleverly adapt to suit.
The main shift that enabled Karate to be embraced by a wider audience was categorising its techniques into a punch/block/kick methodology and fitting them into a longer-range consensual combat model. This also led to the birth of what became known as 3K Karate (Kihon, Kata, Kumite) and paved the way for competitive Karate versus Karate-style engagements.
Although this metamorphosis did not happen overnight, it was nevertheless a swift modification that saw mainstream Karate change so rapidly that, in some ways, it became almost unrecognisable to past generations. It is true that not all styles, dojo, and teachers were directly involved in this shift, but the progression of the art as a whole was certainly influenced as a result.
Competitive karate has progressed from those early days to become a hugely popular activity for hundreds of thousands of practitioners all over the globe. Plus the many styles and systems to have been developed since has meant that the term ‘Karate’ now can mean so many things. For some, it’s a sport. For others it’s a way of life. For many it’s a way to connect together through a mutual challenge. Despite the plethora of debates on the subject, I think it may be a disservice to suggest that only one of these approaches could be regarded as ‘real’ or ‘true’.
Regardless of style and adaptation, the transmission of Karate as we know it today still relies heavily on the fundamental practice of solo movement patterns known as Kata. These forms are said to contain essential lessons on combative techniques, tactics, and strategy for self-defence, as well as providing means of preserving the cultural heritage of Karate for future generations.
The existence and central practice of kata across the numerous factions of Karate may suggest a common methodological make-up that pre-dates the notion of style. Yet we have very little historical evidence as to the definitive meaning of these choreographed practices. This naturally attracts an urge for exploration and analysis, which has caused Karate to adapt across diverse goals.
To comprehend the evolution of Karate in modern times, it is vital to accept the truth that content is born from context. Adaptations are a natural part of development; thus, it is necessary to examine classical kata in a way that removes superficial layers to form an objective perspective aligned with a principle-based approach.
The name 'Karate' is nowadays a catch-all term that is represented by a plethora of styles and systems, all practising according to their own specific way. However, the notion of karate ‘styles’ is very much a modern phenomenon and can often cause a sense of unnecessary distinction, which can blind us from appreciating the holistic picture.
Furthermore, with regard to considerations such as our personal goals for training, how we may feel within a particular dojo environment, the curriculum methodology plus the faith and relationship we have with our teacher, style becomes comparatively less important.
So instead of focusing on individual Karate styles, it is perhaps more valuable to look across the art in accordance with three contextual outcomes:
Kyōgi Karate 競技空手 or ‘Competitive Karate’ has become a very popular sport around the world. It is based on consensual skill versus skill-based engagements and the aesthetic performance of solo kata, following specific rule sets and standards. The objective of Kyōgi Karate—and thus the main factor for the evolution of its training methods—is centred on competitive success.
Budō Karate 武道空手 follows ‘Martial Way’ principles, focusing heavily on the health, personal growth, and longevity of its practitioners. There is an importance on solo training and perfection of technique, along with the preservation of methods passed down from teacher to student, often without alteration or question. The main goal of Budō Karate is to use the art as a way of life; a vehicle for personal introspection and holistic development of body, mind, and spirit.
Dentō Karate 伝統空手 or ‘Traditional Karate’ is named as such to acknowledge the emphasis on practising the art in accordance with its roots as a system of self-defence, against the threat of non-consensual violence. Most notably, this prioritises the study and transmission of kata for objective function, rather than subjective aesthetics. The aim of Dentō Karate is to practice with the means of supporting one’s personal safety strategy.
It’s important to acknowledge that of these three ‘types’ of Karate, there is not one better nor worse than another. They are merely different variations of the art that have been developed to cater for specific goals. Thus, it is quite common for a particular Karate style to have elements of two or even all three of these ‘types’ described above embedded within its training methods.
Issues only arise when we try to implement an expression of Karate within an environment for which it was not intended. This mistake can often be made unknowingly, either through lack of education, or blind faith (for what of a better term) in the transmission of generational teachings that themselves may be contextually flawed.
As a comparison, we could consider activities such as figure skating and speed skating. Both of these involve skating and share some close similarities. However, their contrasting objectives—one prioritising function and the other emphasising aesthetics—make their individual applications, training methods, and resultant forms very different. Karate may be likened in a similar way.
The "developmental mix" found throughout today's Karate styles can pose a real challenge for practitioners in effectively identifying which elements of their training are best suited for specific contextual objectives. This is particularly true in situations where valid crossovers may exist or when the risks associated with applying a technique or training method are obscured by nonsensical, subjective, or even dogmatic expectations.
As an example, it is a fact that combat for sport and combat for self-defence, although sharing some valuable crossovers and mutual benefits, are not the same. They have different goals, different outcomes, different risks, different rules of engagement, and thus different tactics and strategies. If not educated in these differences then we become much less able to discern the validity of our training methods.
It is often the case that, when training in a dojo that favours a more contemporary approach, the classical connection between kata and kumite may become blurred and, in some instances, lost altogether. Even today, with more direct access to information than has ever been available in the history of our world, it is not uncommon to find Karate practitioners still trying to hammer square pegs into round holes. This results in kata interpretation that is, at best, entertainingly unrealistic—and, at worst, potentially life-threatening.
Whereas Kyōgi and Budō Karate are more modern expressions of the art that became heavily popularised after World War II, Dentō Karate is considered an attempt to recover, retain, and pass on its intention as a life-protection art. It is the type of Karate for which the classical kata support. However, following this path is no easy task.
For Dentō Karate practitioners, mindlessly repeating the choreography of kata for the sake of training or performance, without any supporting practical methodology, is a fundamentally flawed pursuit. Given that we are faced with a fragmented history, it is our responsibility to apply our knowledge of Karate alongside relevant experience, objective assumptions, and critical thinking to better understand the choreography of those forms that have been passed down to us.
The life blood in all styles of Karate comes from the practitioner. This is the common denominator that brings the principles of the art into being. So no matter which type or types of Karate you follow or what style you practice, it is important to remember that context is king and to ensure that your training is always relevant to your personal objectives.
Copyright © Chris Denwood. All Rights Reserved