Since the beginning of our human evolution, there has always been a necessity to protect oneself and one’s family against threats of violence. There has also been a fundamental need to safeguard and progressively pass on valuable learning to future generations. Combative martial arts from all over the globe are born from these evolutionary requirements for personal safety and at its core, Dentō Karate is no different.
Classical Karate kata—whether borrowed and modified from Chinese arts or developed directly on Okinawa—may be regarded as assembled records or mnemonics of combative lessons that are intended to be practiced and developed with a training partner. In other words, kata is a solo reference tool, born from experience and educational practice.
As such, kata may be thought of as a digest of movement principles arranged together in a way that may serve to inspire future generations. When likened to academia, they are akin to a series of textbooks or manuals featuring notable examples from which one must strive to unpack, apply, and evolve.
Despite their use in Kyōgi Karate for modern-day competition and in Budō Karate for developing the body, mind, and spirit, numerous writings from past masters—as well as their shared characteristics—make it clear that these were not the original intentions of kata.
In Itosu Anko’s 1908 letter outlining what has become known as his Ten Precepts (Toudi Jukun), he states that this art is not a system for mutually consented combat nor is it intended for skill-versus-skill engagement in a competitive arena…
“Karate (toudi) is not meant to be employed against a single adversary. It is intended to be used as a way of avoiding a fight should one be confronted by a villain or ruffian.”
Itosu felt that Karate is primarily for protecting against the threat of non-consensual violence. In other words, self-defence. Notice also that the term 'avoiding a fight' is used. This helps to define and distinguish Karate in relation to the more holistic goal of personal safety.
Personal safety is less about combative prowess and more about aspects such as being a kind and upstanding member of one’s community, presenting a confident body language profile and demeanour, being aware and alert to abnormal changes in your environment, making sensible day-to-day decisions, becoming a good communicator, and mindfully avoiding risky people, things, places, and times of the day.
Common sense tells us that if we rely solely on physical combative skills, then regardless of how effective that training may be, our personal safety strategy becomes skewed, limited in peaceful solutions and consequently, dangerously flawed.
The implementation of proper attitude, awareness, avoidance, escape, situational control, and de-escalation skills significantly aims to reduce the chances of being selected as a victim or confronted with a situation where physical violence is imposed upon you.
Therefore, it would be prudent to consider these essential 'soft skills' as the baseline platform from which the physical skills of Dentō Karate are assembled and the practical methodology of kata is presented.
The combative aspects of Karate should always be regarded as a last resort, since the risks associated with unnecessary physical confrontation grossly outweigh the benefits. Assuming that the all-important soft skills have either failed or are unavailable, then the interpretation of Karate kata comes to life through the lens of combative tactics that are necessary for managing the exceptions.
At its most fundamental level, Karate is a system of human mechanics. From the viewpoint of self-defence, this involves the dynamic articulation of one’s body to remove, reduce, or control the manifestation of violence before us. Broadly speaking, there are only two ways to achieve this.
The first way is to ESCAPE, aiming to swiftly maximise distance and time. Simply put, if we have the opportunity and capability to flee, then we should do so. It stands to reason that the further we are from a threat and the more time we have to react to situational changes, then the safer we will be.
If escape is not an option, then the second approach is to ENGAGE the threat, once again aiming to facilitate escape at the earliest opportunity and/or physically eliminate the risk.
Any decisions made when facing violence will always be dependent on the scenario. However, we can make a fair assumption that kata presumes the initial protective layers (soft skills) have either failed or are unavailable, making combative engagement (hard skills) a necessity.
If we must physically engage, whether pre-emptively (ahead of time) or reactively (behind time), then two methods are available. In reality, these methods are not usually as clear-cut as presented here, but they are addressed this way to help emphasise their distinction.
The first method is what we may call UNATTACHED ENGAGEMENT, such as a percussive impact stun-and-run strategy. The goal here is to physically overwhelm the threat as quickly as possible before escaping to safety.
In a low-level altercation, this might involve a forceful push to create distance, obtain a larger reactionary gap, maybe then revert to verbal dissuasion in order to attract attention, and create an opportunity to flee.
Higher-risk situations may require a more aggressive response, such as a decisive pre-emptive strike followed by an assertive ‘index’ with additional strikes until the antagonist capitulates. If the enemy remains a threat after the first or second strike, or if pre-emption isn’t possible, then the altercation is likely to escalate to the second method.
One thing we want to avoid during unattached engagement is standing and trading punches or worse. Conversation range (the distance imposed in self-defence) is the most dangerous because you may be struck unawares with minimal ability to react.
Given the inherent dangers of conversation range, the aim is always to increase distance if escape is a viable option, take and maintain the initiative through asymmetrical dominance, or close the distance to control and stifle the antagonist's ability to generate power.
Thus, the second method is referred to as ATTACHED ENGAGEMENT. Depending on the specific scenario, you may attach to the antagonist, they may attach to you, or there may be mutual attachment.
Physical attachment in self-defence makes movement more restricted, escape more difficult, and grappling skills more relevant. It also presents increased risks such as environmental manipulation, multiple attackers, unseen weapons, and loss of control over your own weapon.
This is why Karate emphasises an asymmetrical format of attachment that blends close-range striking with, flanking, framing and an active use of the non-striking limb to control, stifle and reduce retaliation options.
So, based on the information above, we can summarise the general priorities for karate’s self-defence strategy being as follows:
ESCAPE to safety without engagement…
This emphasises why soft skills such as awareness, avoidance, situational control, and de-escalation are vital aspects of any effective personal safety game plan.
UNATTACHED ENGAGEMENT before escaping to safety…
This classic ‘hit-and-run’ strategy may involve situational control, adrenal manipulation, artifice, pre-emption, indexing, continuous strikes, and more. This is why striking is a primary feature of karate.
ATTACHED ENGAGEMENT before escaping to safety…
Spending more time than necessary attached to a threat would be undesirable unless it provides a specific situational benefit. However, disengaging from a grapple is very difficult and comes with other risks.
By studying kata as part of a holistic personal safety game plan, it becomes clear that the combative blueprint of Okinawan Karate is ideally suited for civilian self-protection and law enforcement or peacekeeping scenarios, where close-range physical protection measures may become necessary.
Alongside the historical information and written teachings we have from the pioneering masters of Karate’s past, the common characteristics of classical kata seem to reveal a clear priority on attached combative tactics.
The methods of kata include stand-up distance management and grappling skills combined with close-range percussive striking to vulnerable targets, joint attacks, and felling techniques that favour the ability to remain upright to facilitate swift escape.
Copyright © Chris Denwood. All Rights Reserved